top of page
Search

When Two Operating Models Collide

Writer: Peter Kobzar
Peter Kobzar
3 days ago
2 min read

We’re starting to witness the collision of two very different operating models, and the supply chain is where they meet.


Two models, both rational

Electric utilities have traditionally operated within long planning horizons shaped by quality, reliability, risk management and value for money. Assets are built to last for decades. Procurement is deliberate, governed and accountable, often to regulators and the public. Those disciplines exist for good reasons.


Then came the rapid rise of hyperscale data centres.


Hyperscalers operate differently. For them, lead times and delivery dates are their currency. Months matter; sometimes weeks matter. Speed to energization can outweigh almost every other commercial consideration.


Both approaches make sense within their own environments. The tension appears when they begin drawing on the same supply base.


The same factories, the same slots

Critical components such as transformers, switchgear and circuit breakers are increasingly constrained. Manufacturing capacity for this equipment cannot be expanded quickly. New plants, production lines and skilled workforces take years, not quarters.


This creates an unusual dynamic. The customer driving the need for new grid infrastructure may also be competing with the utility for the manufacturing capacity required to build it.


OEMs are caught in the middle

Do they protect capacity for long-standing utility customers offering stable, predictable demand and enduring relationships?


Or do they allocate more capacity to hyperscalers offering enormous volumes, compressed timelines and potentially attractive margins?


There is no simple answer. Many will try to do both, and the way they make that trade-off will shape delivery performance across the sector.


What it means for each party

For utilities, the traditional approach of tendering each requirement as it arises may no longer secure capacity in time. Longer-term frameworks, aggregated and forecast demand, earlier engagement with OEMs and a deliberate effort to be a customer suppliers want to serve are becoming essential.


For hyperscalers and their EPCs, speed alone may not be enough. Supply relationships built on volume and urgency can be fragile when capacity is scarce. Understanding how manufacturers plan, and the constraints utilities work within, can avoid surprises late in a project.


For OEMs, the decisions made now about capacity allocation, pricing and customer commitments will define relationships for years after this cycle peaks.


A supply chain challenge as much as an energy one

The growth of hyperscale data centres is usually framed as an energy-demand challenge: how much power, where, and how fast. It may ultimately prove to be as much a supply-chain challenge for the electricity sector.


The organizations that recognize this early, and plan their supply strategies accordingly, will be the ones that still get their equipment on time.


Scale and Secure. Whether you are a utility, a developer or a supplier navigating this market, I help organizations build supply strategies and negotiate agreements that hold up when capacity is scarce. Let’s talk.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
When Suppliers Choose Their Customers

Does the traditional buyer–supplier relationship still work? For decades, the model was relatively simple. The buyer tendered and awarded, and suppliers competed for the contract, often with price car

 
 
 
Great Procurement Begins Upstream

By the time an RFP reaches the market, much of the commercial outcome may already have been determined. Organizations often think procurement begins when the RFP is issued. In reality, it starts much

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page